The Asbury Park educational system has been in the press and
on public’s minds a few times during the past few years. Most of the media and
blogs written about the town’s school system describe a school where a large
percentage of students drop out or are suspended. The rates are significantly
higher compared to the NJ averages. Their standardized testing is also lower
than the overall NJ scores, where none of the students scored in the advanced
categories in math, and scored low on language arts.
Every article and blog I read discussed the money the school
district in Asbury park receives and the “dismal “ results that are being
output. One blog, written by Paul
Mulshine, stated that the district spends $35,000 on per pupil expenditures, and in return have
dismal testing results and statistics. The blogger was discussing how this
district receives too much NJ aid compared to the amount of students in the
school system, and should they be receiving that much money if they are
producing good results. The second blog, written by Parth P, I read discussed
aspects of the Asbury Park high school. Again, it stated how disappointing the
standardized test results were, and how the school had improved in state
rankings but a slow and insignificant increase. The football team, other
sports, and choir were mentioned but the author thought they were ok but
nothing that deserved merit.
On the other hand the two articles I analyzed were different
than the blogs in that one only discussed violence in the schools but did not
offer any suggestions as to why there is violence in the schools, police
patrols are needed, and the other provided the students point of view. The article that offered the student's point
of views , written by Patti Martin from the Asbury Park Press, had a more
honest and see through feeling than the others. It also took into account the
feelings and thoughts of students and teachers in the community and did not
focus solely on the negative aspects such as violence, money, or low test
scores. Some of the quotes a couple of the students offered in the article,
made me infer that the students are aware of the negative comments being made
about the school, but they feel like change is being made for the betterment of
them.
Both the blogs and the published articles I reviewed have
strong messages they want to communicate to their audience. Every story we hear
subconsciously impacts us in a way whether we want it to or not, they shape our
understand and shape the way we view and react to things. Our society and culture determine how we see,
hear, and reacts to circumstances. We think that low test scores are fixed by
throwing money at the problem, and if money does not fix it, then let's try to
take the money away, which was the argument in one of the blogs. The Asbury
school system is slowly improving, the data shows it and the students feel it.
Society tells us that we should focus more on the scores of standardized
testing than the feelings of the students actually attending the schools, which
stated in the articles that now they have teachers who care if they succeed. Society determines what is acceptable, and if
as a society we feel that low test scores make a school subservient, it impacts
the way we see the school, the teachers, and the students in that school.
People pass judgment on them, as if they are less deserving because they are
not performing to society's standards which affects they way they begin to see
themselves, and could cause them to give up on their education, and stop
believing in themselves.